How To Build A House

One definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly, but expecting different results.

This post shows quite clearly that America is broken, that power is the hands of a small few and that in my humble opinion, the Social Contract can be considered null and void.

AMERICAN OLIGARCHY By, William J. Federer

"You seem...to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy." - Thomas Jefferson, September 28, 1820, to William Jarvis(1)

Students are taught America is a democracy. Historians clarify it is a constitutional republic.But America is neither - it has become an OLIGARCHY - a rule by a few unelected Federal Judges.Webster's 1828 Dictionary defines "oligarchy" as: "n.[Gr. few, and rule.] A form of government in which the supreme power is placed in a few hands; a species of aristocracy.

"EXAMPLE: For years a bill to ban partial birth abortion worked its way through the U.S. House and Senate. Elected politicians passed it and the President signed it on November 5, 2003. THE SYSTEM WORKED.The next day an unelected Federal Judge suspended the law for years - if not forever. THE SYSTEM STOPPED.

(2)In Missouri, September 5, 1999, elected members of the State House and Senate passed a ban on partial birth abortion. Democrat Governor Carnahan vetoed it. In an historic session, with fifteen thousand citizens kneeling in prayer around the State Capitol, the Legislature overrode his veto. THE SYSTEM WORKED.A few days later, an unelected Federal Judge suspended the law - and over four years later it is still in limbo. THE SYSTEM STOPPED.

(3)Thirty-one States passed bans on Partial Birth Abortion, only to have unelected Federal Judges suspend them.

(4)DESPOT"Absolute and arbitrary authority...independent of the control of men" is Webster's definition of "despot."Thomas Jefferson warned of judicial despotism to William Jarvis, September 28, 1820:"Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so....and their power [is] the more dangerous, as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots."

(5)In his Inaugural, 1841, President William Henry Harrison warned:"The great danger to our institutions does...appear to me to be...the accumulation in one of the departments of that which was assigned to others. Limited as are the powers which have been granted, still enough have been granted to constitute a despotism if concentrated in one of the departments."

(6)EXERCISE IN FUTILITYThe immense effort put into the legislative process - political campaigns, registering voters, getting to polls, voting, watching returns, swearing in legislators, introducing bills, debating bills, voting on bills, overriding vetoes - is all an exercise in futility if only a few unelected judges can invalidate the entire process.*Arizona voted English as their official language, but Federal Judges overruled.(9th Circuit, Prop. 106, March 3, 1997)

(7)*Arkansas passed term limits for politicians, but Federal Judges overruled. (Sup. Ct., Term Limits v Thornton, May 22, 1995)

(8)*Californians voted to stop state-funded taxpayer services to illegal aliens, but Federal Judges overruled. (Prop. 187, Nov. 20, 1995)

(9)*Colorado citizens voted not to give special rights to homosexuals, but Federal Judges overruled. (Sup. Ct. Romer v Evans, 1992)

(10)*Missouri voters defeated a tax increase, but Federal Judges overruled. (8th Circuit, Missouri v Jenkins, Apr. 18, 1990)

(11)*Missouri citizens limited contributions to State candidates, but a Federal Judge overruled. (8th Circuit, Shrink Pac v Nixon, Jan. 24, 2000)

(12)*Missouri passed "A Woman's Right to Know." Governor Holden veto it. Legislators overrode his veto, but Federal Judges overruled. (U.S. District Judge Scott O. Wright, Sep. 11, 2000)

(13)*New York citizens voted against physician-assisted suicide, but Federal Judges overruled. (2nd Circuit, Apr. 2, 1996)

(14)*Washington citizens voted against physician-assisted suicide, but Federal Judges overruled. (9th Circuit, Mar. 6, 1996)

(15)*Washington passed term limits for politicians, but Federal Judges overruled. (Sup. Ct., Term Limits v Thornton, May 22, 1995)

(16)LINCOLNAbraham Lincoln, in his First Inaugural, March 4, 1861, alluded to Justice Roger Taney's infamous Dred Scott Decision (1857), where the Democrat appointed Justice decided slaves were not citizens, but property. Lincoln stated:"I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court....The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their Government into the hands of the eminent tribunal."

(17)THING OF WAXAre judges limited by the Constitution? Thomas Jefferson wrote on September 6, 1819:"The Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please."

(18)USURPING POWERFifty-five men wrote the Constitution, but only thirty-nine signed it. Why did the others not sign it? - Because they did not think it put enough limits on the power of the Federal Government. Men like Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry were against the Constitution. Why? - Because they did not think it put enough limits on the power of the Federal Government.The promoters of the Constitution convinced the Thirteen States that if they ratified the Constitution, the first action of Congress would be to put limits on the new Federal Government. There were ten limits - the First Ten Amendments or Bill of Rights.Over time, the Federal Government usurped power from the States. Thomas Jefferson warned of this in a letter to Mr. Hammond, 1821:"The germ of dissolution of our federal government is in...the federal judiciary; an irresponsible body...working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little to-morrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the States."

(19)CONCENTRATED POWERThe Founders disliked concentrated power."For whatever transcendent power is given, will certainly over-run those that give it...It is necessary therefore, that all power that is on earth be limited." - John Cotton, Colonial leader

(20)"All men having power ought to be distrusted." - James Madison, 1787, Constitutional Convention.

(21)"In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself." - James Madison, Federalist Paper #51

(22)"And of fatal tendency...to put, in the place of the delegated will of the Nation, the will of a party - often a small but artful and enterprising minority....They are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the Power of the People and to usurp for the themselves the reins of Government; destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion." - George Washington, Farewell Address, September 17, 1796.

(23)"It is easy to conceive that great evils to our country and its institutions might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people. Mere precedent is a dangerous source of authority, and should not be regarded as deciding questions of constitutional power." - President Andrew Jackson, July 10, 1832, Bank Renewal Bill Veto

(24)"All history tells us that a free people should be watchful of delegated power, and should never acquiesce in a practice which will diminish their control over it." - Andrew Jackson, December 7, 1835, Seventh Annual Message

(25)"The tendency of power to increase itself, particularly when exercised by a single individual...would terminate in virtual monarchy." - William Henry Harrison, Inaugural Address, 1841

(26)"All power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - Lord Acton, April 5, 1881, letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton

(27)CONFUSION OF POWERSNovember 18, 2003, even as Massachusetts Legislators were working to define marriage as between a man and a woman, four unelected State Supreme Court Judges "ordered" the State Legislature to pass a law within 180 days recognizing homosexual marriage.

(28)Instead of "Separation of Powers" the Massachusetts Supreme Court is suffering from "Confusion of Powers." One branch of government cannot "order" another branch to do anything. In addition, deciding what laws need to be passed is the responsibility of the Legislative Branch. The Judicial Branch must not try to invent laws.Thomas Jefferson advised Supreme Court Justice William Johnson, June 12, 1823:"On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

(29)ALL WOULD BE LOSTBaron Montesquieu, the most quoted writer by the Framers of the Constitution, foresaw the dangers of uncontrolled judicial power. In his Spirit of the Laws, 1748, he wrote:"Nor is there liberty if the power of judging is not separated from legislative power and from executive power.Montesquieu explained:"If it were joined to legislative power, the power over life and liberty of the citizens would be arbitrary, for the judge would be the legislator. If it were joined to executive power, the judge could have the force of an oppressor. All would be lost if the same...body of principal men...exercised these three powers."

(30)Alexis de Tocqueville, author of Democracy in America (1835), warned: "The President, who exercises a limited power, may err without causing great mischief in the State. Congress may decide amiss without destroying the Union, because the electoral body in which Congress originates may cause it to retract its decision by changing its members. But if the Supreme Court is ever composed of imprudent men or bad citizens, the Union may be plunged into anarchy or civil war."

(31)Let us be watchful, lest the Democracy we enjoy, in the form of our Constitutional Republic, be transformed into an American Oligarchy.

(1) Thomas Jefferson, September 28, 1820, in a letter to William Jarvis. Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson's Letters, Wilson Whitman, ed., (Eau Claire, WI: E.M. Hale & Co., 1900), p. 338. Gary DeMar, God and Government-A Biblical and Historical Study (Atlanta, GA: American Vision Press, 1982), p. 166.
(2) Judge Blocks Partial-Birth Abortion Ban By KEVIN O'HANLON Associated PressLINCOLN, Neb. (AP) - November 5, 2003 at 11:54:35 PST A federal judge blocked implementation of a federal ban on certain late-term abortions Wednesday less than an hour after President Bush signed the ban into law. U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf issued a temporary restraining order citing concerns that the law did not contain an exception for preserving the health of the woman seeking the abortion.
(3) Friday, September 17, 1999 Planned Parenthood gains injunction against abortion law Follows Senate action overriding Carnahan veto By GERRY TRITZ News Tribune The state Senate enacted a "partial-birth abortion" ban against Gov. Mel Carnahan's wishes on Thursday, making him the seventh Missouri governor since statehood in 1821 to have a veto overturned. The new law took effect Thursday evening, but failed to last through noon today. U.S. District Judge Scott Wright issued a 10-day stay against enforcing the new law after Planned Parenthood filed a constitutional challenge this morning. http://newstribune.com/stories/091799/sta_0917990040.asp
http://report.kff.org/archive/repro/2000/06/kr000630.1.htm
(4) http://www.crlp.org/st_law_pba.html
(5) Thomas Jefferson, September 28, 1820, in a letter to William Jarvis. Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson's Letters, Wilson Whitman, ed., (Eau Claire, WI: E.M. Hale & Co., 1900), p. 338. Gary DeMar, God and Government-A Biblical and Historical Study (Atlanta, GA: American Vision Press, 1982), p. 166.
(6) Harrison, William Henry. March 4, 1841, Thursday, in his Inaugural Address. James D. Richardson (U.S. Representative from Tennessee), ed., A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents 1789-1897, 10 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, published by Authority of Congress, 1897, 1899; Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Literature and Art, 1789-1902, 11 vols., 1907, 1910), Vol. 4, pp. 6-20.
(7) http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-974.ZS.html
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/JWCRAWFORD/art28.htm Prop 106, ACLU News - The Newspaper of the ACLU of Northern California, July/August 1998 ACLU Helps Defeat Official English Law in Arizona BY MARIA ARCHULETA http://www.aclunc.org/aclunews/news498/arizona-english.html
(8) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/termlimits/stories/052395.htm U.S. Term Limits Inc. v. Thornton Congressional Term Limits Struck Down By Joan Biskupic Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, May 23, 1995; Page A01 The Supreme Court ruled yesterday that states could not set term limits for members of Congress, saying American democracy was built on the principle that individual voters choose who governs and for how long. In a 5 to 4 decision, the court found that the states do not have the constitutional authority to regulate the tenure of federal legislators. The ruling effectively overturns term limits laws in 23 states and makes amending the Constitution the only sure means of restricting incumbency.... MAJORITY OPINION: "Permitting individual States to formulate diverse qualifications for their congressional representatives would result in a patchwork of state qualifications, undermining the uniformity and the national character that the Framers envisioned and sought to ensure." - Justice John Paul Stevens Joined by: * Justice Anthony M. Kennedy * Justice David Souter * Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg * Justice Stephen Breyer THE DISSENT: "The Constitution is simply silent on this question. And where the Constitution is silent, it raises no bar to action by the states or the people." - Justice Clarence Thomas Joined by: * Chief Justice William Rehnquist * Justice Sandra Day O'Connor * Justice Antonin Scalia (c) Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company.
(9) http://www.migrationint.com.au/news/canary_islands/dec_1995-02mn.asp Immigration Laws: December, 1995 - Number #2 Parts of Prop. 187 Unconstitutional A federal judge in Los Angeles declared most sections of Prop. 187 unconstitutional in a 72-page ruling issued on November 20, 1995. According to the judge, "The authority to regulate immigration belongs exclusively to the federal government, and state agencies are not permitted to assume that authority."
(10) http://www.nlf.net/Romer.html National Legal Foundation - Roy Romer, Governor of Colorado v. Richard G. Evans et al United States Supreme Court On November 3, 1992, the people of Colorado adopted Amendment 2 by a vote of 53.4% to 46.6%. In this most democratic of processes, the people of the state had spoken by referendum and enjoined their state and all lower governments from granting protected status to a group of individuals based not on an inalienable physical characteristic, but on a chosen lifestyle.... Roy G. Romer, Governor of Colorado, is on record as opposing initiatives that "deny" special rights and protection to homosexuals. ... the Supreme Court issued what may be the worst decision in the history of the court, finding that Amendment 2 did discriminate against an identifiable class of people and violated their rights to due process and equal protection under the law.
(11) http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/255/%20Missouri%20v.%20Jenkins 495 U.S. 33 (1990) Docket Number: 88-1150 Abstract Argued: October 30, 1989 Decided: April 18, 1990 Subjects: Judicial Power: Jurisdiction of Federal Courts Facts of the Case ...In order to combat segregation in public schools in compliance with court directives, the Kansas City, Missouri School District (KCMSD) sought to enhance the quality of schools and to attract more white students from the suburbs. The KCMSD's ability to raise taxes, however, was limited by state law. After determining that the District did not have alternative means of raising revenue for the program, federal district judge Russell G. Clark ordered an increase of local property taxes for the 1991-92 fiscal year. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the decision, but ruled that the courts should enjoin state tax laws that prevented the District from raising the necessary funds and allow the state to set tax rates.
(12) http://www.campaignfinancesite.org/book/html/211.html Supreme Court Reconsiders Contribution Limits Dan Manatt This selection originally was titled "In Shrink PAC v. Nixon, Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Contributions Limits," from the "Recent Developments in the Campaign Finance Regulations" section of the Brookings Institution's web site (www.brookings.org). This article addresses the Supreme Court's decision to review Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC, in which the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated Missouri's limits on campaign contributions.
(13) [Federal] Judge will block new abortion law [MO] Posted by madprof98 On 10/09/2003 5:55 PM PDT with 3 comments Jefferson City (MO) News Tribune ^ 10/9/03 DAVID A. LIEB (AP) A federal judge said Wednesday he will block a new Missouri law that would have required physicians to wait 24 hours after consulting a woman before performing an abortion. Senior U.S. District Judge Scott O. Wright plans to issue the temporary restraining order against the law on Friday -- one day before the abortion law was to take effect, said Wright's clerk. The decision came during a private telephone conference the judge held Wednesday with attorneys for the state and Planned Parenthood affiliates, who had challenged the law on grounds it is unconstitutionally vague and broad. September 11, 2003, Family Research Council, State of the Family, Vol. 3, Issue 4., http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=SF03J01&v=PRINT#top , September 11, 2003 Missouri Senate overrides MO Governor's veto of Conceal Carry Missouri passed a "Conceal Carry" bill. Governor Holden vetoed it. Legislators overrode his veto, but a judge overruled. (St. L. Cir. Judge Steven Ohmer, Oct 10, 2003.) http://www.packing.org/news/article.jsp/9231 (KSDK) -- A St. Louis Circuit Court decided Friday that Missouri's concealed weapons law will not go in effect Saturday, October 11. Judge Steven Ohmer made his ruling at 4:00 Friday afternoon. Opponents of the concealed carry law say the law's wording was vague and that a clause in the Missouri constitution bans concealed weapons. http://www.packing.org/news/article.jsp/9277
(14) Second Circuit On July 20, 1994, Compassion in Dying filed a complaint for declaratory judgment on behalf of 3 New York physicians and 3 terminally ill patients. On Dec 15, 1994, US District Court Chief Judge Thomas P, Griesa upheld New York law prohibiting assisted suicide (penal law sections 120.30 and 125.15. On April 2, 1996, a 3-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals struck down those laws as relates to physicians and terminally ill patients (Quill v. Vacco). The decision, and concurrence are available from Touro Law Center and Pace University School of Law.
(15) Washington State On January 25, 1994, Compassion in Dying initiated a legal challenge of Washington State's prohibition against assisted suicide, RCW 9A.36.060. On May 3, 1994, Federal Judge Barbara J. Rothstein rendered a decision declaring the law unconstitutional. On March 9, 1995, a 3-Judge Panel of the Ninth District Court of Appeals overturned the District Court (2-1). On March 6, 1996 the Ninth District Court (en banc) reinstated the District Court ruling. The decision and dissent are available via Deathnet.
(16) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/termlimits/stories/052395.htm U.S. Term Limits Inc. v. Thornton Congressional Term Limits Struck Down By Joan Biskupic Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, May 23, 1995; Page A01 The Supreme Court ruled yesterday that states could not set term limits for members of Congress, saying American democracy was built on the principle that individual voters choose who governs and for how long. In a 5 to 4 decision, the court found that the states do not have the constitutional authority to regulate the tenure of federal legislators. The ruling effectively overturns term limits laws in 23 states and makes amending the Constitution the only sure means of restricting incumbency.... MAJORITY OPINION: "Permitting individual States to formulate diverse qualifications for their congressional representatives would result in a patchwork of state qualifications, undermining the uniformity and the national character that the Framers envisioned and sought to ensure." - Justice John Paul Stevens Joined by: * Justice Anthony M. Kennedy * Justice David Souter * Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg * Justice Stephen Breyer THE DISSENT: "The Constitution is simply silent on this question. And where the Constitution is silent, it raises no bar to action by the states or the people." - Justice Clarence Thomas Joined by: * Chief Justice William Rehnquist * Justice Sandra Day O'Connor * Justice Antonin Scalia (c) Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company. Supreme Court Breaks Constitutional Constraints 2003-08-08 by Sue Ella Deadwyler, Eagle Forum of Georgia, Nov. 11, 2003, http://www.georgiaeagle.org/index.php?where=articles&ID=215
(17) Lincoln, Abraham. March 4, 1861, Monday, in his First Inaugural Address. James D. Richardson (U.S. Representative from Tennessee), ed., A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents 1789-1897, 10 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, published by Authority of Congress, 1897, 1899; Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Literature and Art, 1789-1902, 11 vols., 1907, 1910), Vol. VI, pp. 9-11.
(18) Jefferson, Thomas. September 6, 1819. Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson Writings, Merrill D. Peterson, ed., (NY: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., 1984), p. 1426.
(19) Jefferson, Thomas. 1821, in a letter to Mr. Hammond. Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson on Democracy, Saul K. Padover, ed., (NY: D. Appleton-Century Co., 1939), p. 64.
(20) Cotton, John. Perry Miller and Thomas H. Johnson, The Puritans: A Sourcebook of Their Writings Vol. I (New York: Harper & Row, 1938, 1963), pp. 212-214. John Eidsmoe, Christianity and the Constitution - The Faith of Our Founding Fathers (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, A Mott Media Book, 1987; 6th printing, 1993), pp. 34-35.
(21) Madison, James. 1787, in a remark on the floor of the Constitutional Convention. M.E. Bradford, A Worthy Company (Marlborough, New Hampshire: Plymouth Rock Foundation, 1982), p. 147. John Eidsmoe, Christianity and the Constitution - The Faith of Our Founding Fathers (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, A Mott Media Book, 1987, 6th printing 1993), p. 102.
(22) Madison, James. James Madison, The Federalist No. 51, The Federalist Papers, Clinton Rossiter, ed., (New York: Mentor Books, 1961), p. 322. John Eidsmoe, Christianity and the Constitution - The Faith of Our Founding Fathers (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, A Mott Media Book, 1987, 6th printing 1993), p. 102. David A. Noebel, Understanding The Times - The Story of the Biblical Christian, Marxist/Leninist and Secular Humanist Worldviews (Manitou Springs, CO: Summit Press, a branch of Summit Ministries, P.O. Box 207, Manitou Springs, Co., 80829, 1993), pp. 623-624.
(23) Washington, George. September 19, 1796, in his Farewell Address, published in the American Daily Advertiser, Philadelphia, September, 1796. James D. Richardson (U.S. Representative from Tennessee), ed., A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents 1789-1897, 10 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, published by Authority of Congress, 1897, 1899; Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Literature and Art, 1789-1902, 11 vols., 1907, 1910), Vol. 1, p. 213-224, September 17, 1796.
(24) Jackson, Andrew. 1832, Veto of the Bank Renewal Bill. James D. Richardson (U.S. Representative from Tennessee), ed., A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents 1789-1897, 10 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, published by Authority of Congress, 1897, 1899; Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Literature and Art, 1789-1902, 11 vols., 1907, 1910), Vol. II, pp. 576-591. Richard D. Heffner, A Documentary History of the United States (New York: The New American Library of World Literature, Inc., 1961), pp. 93-96.
(25) Jackson, Andrew. December 7, 1835, in his Seventh Annual Message to Congress. James D. Richardson (U.S. Representative from Tennessee), ed., A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents 1789-1897, 10 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, published by Authority of Congress, 1897, 1899; Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Literature and Art, 1789-1902, 11 vols., 1907, 1910), Vol. II, pp. 148, 164-165, 177.
(26) Harrison, William Henry. March 4, 1841, Thursday, in his Inaugural Address. James D. Richardson (U.S. Representative from Tennessee), ed., A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents 1789-1897, 10 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, published by Authority of Congress, 1897, 1899; Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Literature and Art, 1789-1902, 11 vols., 1907, 1910), Vol. 4, pp. 6-20.
(27) Acton, John Emerich Edward Dalberg, Lord. April 5, 1881, in a letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton. John Bartlett, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1855, 1980), p. 615. The World Book Encyclopedia, 22 vols. (Chicago, IL: World Book, Inc., 1989; W.F. Quarrie and Company, 8 vols., 1917), Vol. 1, p. 31. Marshall Foster and Mary-Elaine Swanson, The American Covenant - The Untold Story (Roseburg, OR: Foundation for Christian Self-Government, 1981; Thousand Oaks, CA: The Mayflower Institute, 1983, 1992), p. 135.
(28) http://www.marriagematters.org/ http://www.townhall.com/columnists/terencejeffrey/tj20031119.shtml
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=%5CCulture%5Carchive%5C200311%5CCUL20031119a.html
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/07/14/same.sex.marriages/
(29) Jefferson, Thomas. June 12, 1823, in a letter to Justice William Johnson. Thomas Jefferson, Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies, From the Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Randolph, editor (Boston: Gray and Bowen, 1830), Vol. IV, p. 373. Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson Writings, Merrill D. Peterson, ed., (NY: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., 1984), p. 1475.
(30) Montesquieu, Baron Charles Louis Joseph de Secondat. 1748. Baron Charles Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws, 1748, Anne Cohler, trans. (reprinted Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 157.
(31) Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1835), Book One.

Monday, June 14, 2010

AMERICA DOES NOT WORK

WESTERN CIVILIZATION IS NOT IN THE HANDS OF WESTERN MAN